#Birds of prey movie title movie
#Birds of prey movie title full

#Birds of prey movie title movie

Using a random number generator, I navigated to the designated movie on the list, added it to a spreadsheet, then repeated the process until I reached 100 titles. To achieve randomness, I used a “Random Movie Roulette” Letterboxd list of 7,596 movies curated by user Tobias Andersen. And even if I think I’m not doing it because I want my results to go one way, I may do it without thinking. Since my thesis is all about longer movies being better, I can’t just go ahead and pick bad short-title movies to fill out my roster. Strong statistical studies incorporate randomness in order to prevent unconscious bias. Image: Universal Pictures The importance of randomness

#Birds of prey movie title full

Plus, the best and worst movies lists don’t tell us anything about the films that are bad-but-not-too-bad or good-but-not-too-good - we need to get a full sample of movies from across the gamut of quality in order to see if there is indeed a trend.Ĭats (2019): one word in the title, 20% “fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes. But keep in mind that 52% of the worst movies on Rotten Tomatoes are also one- to two-worders. One might assume from scanning the list of Rotten Tomatoes’ top 100 movies of all time that shorter titles play better for critics, with roughly 50% of the titles settling for one or two words.

Still, if there is indeed a relationship between title length and critical score, we could have concrete proof of why Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) was so well-received. That doesn’t necessarily mean one causes the other, but that they share a strong relationship that could be influenced by a wide variety of factors (movies with long, pretentious titles may be liked by long, pretentious people, for instance). Suppose our thesis is correct, and we find a trend between critical scores and movies with long titles. Movie taste is subjective, but we’ll use Rotten Tomatoes’ critics scores as a barometer for putting some quantitative markers on the idea of a “good movie.” Furthermore, let us clarify the golden rule of statistics: Correlation does not imply causation. We’re going to prove - with math! - whether or not movies with longer titles are better. Thanks to the magic of statistics, there’s a way to test the hypothesis.

Is it possible that, compared to their less verbose counterparts, movies with long titles are just … better? Does Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) have a critical leg up on the superhero movie competition, just by stuffing syllables onto its poster? Compared to recent flubs like Cats and Doolittle, which boast dinky one-word titles and horrible Rotten Tomatoes scores, these overly loquacious names seem indicative of a higher cinematic pedigree. The journey to reclaim Harley’s character clearly demanded a title that was as different from the 12-letter, four-syllable, two-word Suicide Squad as could be.īesides being mouthfuls, Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) and Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan also happen to have high critical ratings, both sitting at 91% “fresh” on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. With 56 letters, 19 syllables, and 11 words, Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) joins the ranks of Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) and Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan in the annals of lengthy film titles.